Subscribe

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Motorsport prime

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Edition

USA
Breaking news

European Union 'turns eye' to F1 crisis - report

The civil war of the rich vs. the not-so-rich rages on in Formula One.

Gerard Lopez, Lotus F1 Team Principal with Bernie Ecclestone (GBR)

Gerard Lopez, Lotus F1 Team Principal with Bernie Ecclestone (GBR)

XPB Images

Nico Hulkenberg, Sahara Force India F1 VJM07
Esteban Gutierrez, Sauber C33 leads Kimi Raikkonen, Ferrari F14-T
Romain Grosjean, Lotus F1 E22
Ross Brawn, Mercedes AMG F1 Team Principal
Sebastian Vettel, Red Bull Racing RB10
Race winner Nico Rosberg, Mercedes AMG F1 W05 celebrates at the end of the race
Max Mosley, FIA President
Daniel Ricciardo, Red Bull Racing RB10 and Valtteri Bottas, Williams FW36

The threat of a major civil war within Formula One is growing by the day.

That is the claim of Germany's Auto Motor und Sport, following reports disgruntled small teams Lotus, Sauber and Force India are furious talks to have more income released by F1 owner CVC are failing to bear fruit.

Correspondent Michael Schmidt says the teams have abandoned their race boycott threats, acknowledging it was not the right course of action.

Is it legal?

The suggestion now is that they genuinely question whether the current system of decision-making and income distribution within F1 is even legal.

They reportedly feel that the fact teams like Ferrari and Red Bull receive substantially more base income is contrary to European Union competition laws.

Giving the big teams more money is akin to allowing them to have bigger engines

Max Mosley

"Bernie (Ecclestone) regarded (the F1 teams alliance) FOTA as a real threat and he had to end the risk of a breakaway series," said former F1 chief Ross Brawn.

"He drew out Ferrari and Red Bull with the promise of paying them a big extra bonus."

Former FIA president Max Mosley reportedly acknowledges that the inequitable distribution is also against the governing body's own statutes.

"Giving the big teams more money is akin to allowing them to have bigger engines," he is quoted as saying.

Not only that, the decision-making 'Strategy Group' is predominated by Ecclestone and the major teams, excluding the likes of Lotus, Sauber and Force India altogether.

The trio also wonders if Ferrari's apparent rule-changing 'veto power' would survive the cross-examination of a European Commission investigation.

"Apparently," said Schmidt, "the Commission has recently turned an eye to Formula One as there is so much in the press about it."

He said Mosley's view is that F1 must now urgently enact a three-point plan: redistribute income equitably, slash costs and simplify the regulations.

Be part of Motorsport community

Join the conversation
Previous article India GP now heading for 2016 return
Next article Now correspondent critiques struggling teams

Top Comments

There are no comments at the moment. Would you like to write one?

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Motorsport prime

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Edition

USA