F1's power vacuum: are lunatics running the asylum?

Formula 1 is operating in something of a power vacuum, and Kate Walker investigates who's got the real authority when it comes to strategic decisions going forwards.

F1's power vacuum: are lunatics running the asylum?
Max Verstappen, Scuderia Toro Rosso STR10
Daniil Kvyat, Red Bull Racing RB11 locks up under braking
Sergio Perez, Sahara Force India F1 VJM08
(L to R): Bernie Ecclestone, with Claire Williams, Williams Deputy Team Principal
Gerard Lopez, Lotus F1 Team Principal with Bernie Ecclestone (GBR)
Bernie Ecclestone, with Christian Horner, Red Bull Racing Team Principal and Cyril Abiteboul, Renault Sport F1 Managing Director
(L to R): Dr. Vijay Mallya, Sahara Force India F1 Team Owner with Robert Fernley, Sahara Force India F1 Team Deputy Team Principal
Robert Fernley, Sahara Force India F1 Team Deputy Team Principal
Maurizio Arrivabene, Ferrari Team Principal and Graeme Lowdon, Manor F1 Team Chief Executive Officer in the FIA Press Conference
Monisha Kaltenborn, Sauber Team Principal and Claire Williams, Williams Deputy Team Principal in the FIA Press Conference
Toto Wolff, Mercedes AMG F1 Shareholder and Executive Director in the FIA Press Conference
Jean Todt, FIA President with Jean Reno, Actor on the grid
Eric Boullier, McLaren Racing Director in the FIA Press Conference
(L to R): Jean Todt, FIA President with Dr. Vijay Mallya, Sahara Force India F1 Team Owner on the grid
Bernie Ecclestone (GBR)

F1 supremo Bernie Ecclestone admitted last November that – as an employee of CVC Capital Partners – he lacked his former authority to make unilateral decisions that could better (or worsen…) the sport.

Speaking to the media at last year's US Grand Prix in Austin, when both Marussia and Caterham were missing in action, Ecclestone absolved himself of responsibility for F1's financial messes, saying that he didn't have the power to enforce change.

"If the company belonged to me, I would have done things in a different way," he said. "That's because it would have been my money I was dealing with, but I work for people who are in the business to make money."

At the same event, Ecclestone blamed the teams' individual contracts for F1's financial quagmire, contracts that he himself negotiated as part of a long-employed divide and conquer strategy to focus the nexus of power within the sport.

"I know what's wrong [with F1], but don't know how to fix it," he said. "No one is prepared to do anything about it because they can't. The regulations have tied us up.

"If we were in a position where we could help these teams in trouble, we would do it. But we are not allowed to.

"If one team is given $10,000, everyone has to have $10,000. The trouble with lots of regulations and lots of contracts is we don't think long term."

The root of all the problems

It is these divide-and-rule contracts, giving certain teams both preferential payments and regulatory control, which Force India deputy team principal Bob Fernley pointed to as the root of all of F1's current problems when speaking to the media on Friday afternoon in Sepang.

"We've got to go back a little while to where I think the problems have started, and I think, a few years ago we had FOTA operating in a very good way," Fernley said. "It was a consolidated approach, it was well-stewarded by Martin Whitmarsh, we were in joint negotiations with CVC at the time to obviously renegotiate those contracts and everything else.

"Unfortunately – and I say that because obviously Christian [Horner] is here – Red Bull felt the need to take the 40 pieces of silver and that was the downside I think for F1 and I don't think we've recovered from that particular action."

Horner refuted Fernley's comment, saying that Ferrari was the first team to cut an individual deal with Ecclestone, while McLaren were in dual discussions with both FOTA and the F1 boss.

Wherever one chooses to place the blame, one thing cannot be denied: the individual deals cut by certain teams have led to a situation in which it is the lunatics who are running the asylum.

Why the FIA can't make all the calls

The first sign that the FIA no longer had the authority to impose regulations on the sport it is supposed to govern came in April last year, when president Jean Todt admitted to the media in Bahrain that his plans to introduce regulatory cost controls for 2015 had been torpedoed by the F1 Strategy Group.

"Most of the teams were in favour of the cost cap, but I understand that all the teams that are part of the Strategy Group are against it now," Todt said.

"So clearly, if the commercial rights holder, and if six teams, which means 12 of 18 are against, I cannot impose it. It's mathematics."

Teams dominated by 'self interest'

As long ago as the 2013 Indian Grand Prix, there were concerns that the then-nascent Strategy Group would be dominated by self-interest. Asked how he felt about the existence of a regulatory group to which he did not belong, Vijay Mallya admitted having had concerns.

"When this was first mooted, I definitely did question whether the intention was to restrict decision-making to the six teams, to the exclusion of the smaller teams," he said.

"But when I was assured that that was not going to be the case, that the Strategy Group was to advise on future strategy concerning Formula 1, to be then debated or voted upon at the Formula One Commission where all teams are represented, that obviously was a source of comfort.

"I've spoken individually to many team principals who are part of the big six, and all of them have assured me that they will look after the interests of all, which includes the smaller teams."

History has revealed that Mallya should have heeded his initial instincts.

Conclusion

We now find ourselves in the unusual position of being in a sport with many rulers, but no focus of power.

Bernie Ecclestone can't enforce the changes he wants to see brought about, Jean Todt is unable to force through regulations in the long-term interests of the sport, and the teams are either left out in the cold or in-fighting to the death to preserve any advantages they may have.

One wonders if the asylum was to catch fire, that they might dance in the flames as it burns…

shares
comments
Red Bull admits chassis also to blame for poor form

Previous article

Red Bull admits chassis also to blame for poor form

Next article

Marko slams "sad" age restrictions in F1

Marko slams "sad" age restrictions in F1
Load comments
Hungarian Grand Prix driver ratings Prime

Hungarian Grand Prix driver ratings

This was race that showcased the best and worst of Formula 1, producing a first time winner and a memorable comeback to a podium finish. Avoiding trouble at the start and astute strategy calls were key to success, but where some drivers took full advantage, others made key errors that cost them dearly

The "heart-breaking" call that led to Ocon's Hungarian GP triumph Prime

The "heart-breaking" call that led to Ocon's Hungarian GP triumph

Set to restart the red-flagged Hungarian Grand Prix in second, Esteban Ocon had some doubts when he peeled into the pits to swap his intermediate tyres for slicks. But this "heart-breaking" call was vindicated in spectacular fashion as the Alpine driver staved off race-long pressure from Sebastian Vettel for a memorable maiden Formula 1 victory

The F1 champion who became an Indy king in his second career Prime

The F1 champion who became an Indy king in his second career

Emerson Fittipaldi’s decision to go racing with his brother led to him falling out of F1, but he bloomed again on the IndyCar scene. NIGEL ROEBUCK considers a career of two halves

Formula 1
Jul 31, 2021
Why Mercedes is pleased to be in the Hungary hunt at a 'Red Bull track' Prime

Why Mercedes is pleased to be in the Hungary hunt at a 'Red Bull track'

Mercedes ended Friday practice at the Hungaroring with a clear gap to Red Bull thanks to Valtteri Bottas’s pace in topping FP2. But there are other reasons why the Black Arrows squad feels satisfied with its progress so far at a track many Formula 1 observers reckon favours Red Bull overall...

Formula 1
Jul 30, 2021
How Red Bull endured its second car crash in two weeks Prime

How Red Bull endured its second car crash in two weeks

OPINION: Red Bull was justified to be upset that Lewis Hamilton survived his British GP clash with Max Verstappen and went on to win. But its attempts to lobby the FIA to reconsider the severity of Hamilton's in-race penalty were always likely to backfire, and have only succeeded in creating a PR disaster that will distract from its on-track efforts

Formula 1
Jul 30, 2021
The ‘screaming’ F1 engine future that may not be out of reach Prime

The ‘screaming’ F1 engine future that may not be out of reach

OPINION: It wasn't just the Verstappen/Hamilton clash that had the Red Bull and Mercedes bosses at loggerheads at Silverstone, with the nature of Formula 1's 2025 engines also subject for disagreement. But hopes to have loud, emotive engines that are also environmentally friendly don't have to be opposed.

Formula 1
Jul 29, 2021
How Lotus uncovered, then squandered its last ‘unfair advantage’ Prime

How Lotus uncovered, then squandered its last ‘unfair advantage’

Cast in the mould of its founder Colin Chapman, Lotus was powerful and daring but flawed – as it proved through further soaring peaks and painful troughs into the 1980s. DAMIEN SMITH examines a game-changing era

Formula 1
Jul 27, 2021
The core problems Yas Marina’s long-awaited tweaks won't address Prime

The core problems Yas Marina’s long-awaited tweaks won't address

OPINION: Changes to the layout of Abu Dhabi’s circuit aim to reverse the trend of insipid Formula 1 races there - the promoter has even described one of the new corners as “iconic”. And that, argues STUART CODLING, is one of this venue’s abiding failings

Formula 1
Jul 26, 2021