Formula 1
Formula 1
30 Apr
-
03 May
FP1 in
70 days
07 May
-
10 May
FP1 in
77 days
21 May
-
24 May
FP1 in
90 days
R
Azerbaijan GP
04 Jun
-
07 Jun
FP1 in
105 days
11 Jun
-
14 Jun
FP1 in
112 days
25 Jun
-
28 Jun
FP1 in
126 days
02 Jul
-
05 Jul
FP1 in
133 days
16 Jul
-
19 Jul
FP1 in
147 days
R
Hungarian GP
30 Jul
-
02 Aug
FP1 in
161 days
27 Aug
-
30 Aug
FP1 in
189 days
03 Sep
-
06 Sep
FP1 in
196 days
R
Singapore GP
17 Sep
-
20 Sep
FP1 in
210 days
24 Sep
-
27 Sep
FP1 in
217 days
R
United States GP
22 Oct
-
25 Oct
FP1 in
245 days
29 Oct
-
01 Nov
FP1 in
252 days
R
Brazilian GP
12 Nov
-
15 Nov
FP1 in
266 days
R
Abu Dhabi GP
26 Nov
-
29 Nov
FP1 in
280 days

Ferrari concedes Leclerc Q1 risk was "not worthwhile"

shares
comments
Ferrari concedes Leclerc Q1 risk was "not worthwhile"
By:
May 25, 2019, 5:43 PM

Ferrari has admitted it made a mistake and took a risk that was “not worthwhile”, after Charles Leclerc was a shock early elimination from Formula 1 qualifying in Monaco.

Leclerc will start his home grand prix from 15th on the grid after being knocked out in Q1 when Ferrari failed to send him back out for a second run as rivals improved.

Ferrari team principal Mattia Binotto arranged an unscheduled media briefing to explain a “misjudgement” with the cut-off time to make it through to Q2, and the decision not to react despite Leclerc questioning whether he was safe.

Binotto acknowledged that “we may argue that as Ferrari these are mistakes that should not happen” but countered that Ferrari’s position in the championship – 96 points behind Mercedes – means it needs to “take some risks” to catch up.

He explained that Ferrari wanted to avoid sending Leclerc out for a second run to save a set of tyres, because it felt that was its best opportunity to challenge Mercedes and also Red Bull.

“But no doubt that when you look at the implication of not entering Q2, it is even bigger than trying to challenge them on the final part of quali,” Binotto said.

Binotto said Ferrari failed to react to this because it was trusting “a wrong evaluation” of the time required to make it through to Q2.

“The cut-off time is calculated real-time based on what we may see on the track, based on real-time sectors from all the drivers,” he said. “When the cut-off time is calculated we normally add a margin on top of it.

“The margin is good enough to afford for any tolerances or uncertainty, which may happen normally during a session.

“Certainly what happened today, the margin we applied was not sufficient, or very little.”

Binotto said the error was “not at all” down to the team focusing too much on Sebastian Vettel, who had already slipped into the drop zone and was set to be knocked out without an improvement.  

“We’ve got two full teams, one per driver,” he said. “We didn’t compromise at all. The threshold was the same for the two drivers.

“On the one side we had the necessity to go out. Charles asked from his cockpit ‘should I go out, I think it’s a bit too marginal, we may be at risk’.

“We replied ‘no, we’ve got the data, and we believe that’s good enough’. It wasn’t.”

Asked by Motorsport.com if he had personally considered overruling the decision or thought it was marginal like his driver, Binotto said: “When you’ve got tools and simulations you should somehow trust what you’re doing.

“We were fully cautious that it would have been tight, but our tools were telling us it would have been good enough.

“We were taking risks, too many risks, [that were] not worthwhile in such a situation. It’s a misjudgement. And a misjudgement is a mistake.”

Next article
Monaco GP: Starting grid in pictures

Previous article

Monaco GP: Starting grid in pictures

Next article

Ricciardo: "Brave" set-up led to best grid position of 2019

Ricciardo: "Brave" set-up led to best grid position of 2019
Load comments

About this article

Series Formula 1
Event Monaco GP
Drivers Charles Leclerc
Teams Ferrari Shop Now
Author Scott Mitchell