Formula 1
Formula 1
19 Sep
-
22 Sep
Event finished
26 Sep
-
29 Sep
Event finished
10 Oct
-
13 Oct
Event finished
24 Oct
-
27 Oct
Event finished
01 Nov
-
03 Nov
Event finished
14 Nov
-
17 Nov
FP3 in
15 Hours
:
19 Minutes
:
50 Seconds

Haas F1 title sponsor Rich loses court case over logo

shares
comments
Haas F1 title sponsor Rich loses court case over logo
By:
May 14, 2019, 3:08 PM

Haas Formula 1 team title sponsor Rich Energy Ltd and its CEO William Storey have lost a court case over a copyright infringement claim filed by specialist bicycle manufacturer Whyte Bikes.

The Sussex-based company took action to defend its stag logo, claiming that the Rich Energy logo was a copy of its own, and was being used without authorisation.

 

As well as its presence on drink cans, the stag logo features prominently on the 2019 Haas car, as well as as on the helmets of Kevin Magnussen and Romain Grosjean.

The judgement in effect means that Rich Energy can no longer use the stag logo in any form. However, in response the company says that it may submit an appeal.

The case, in which Rich Energy’s logo designer Sean Kelly was also a defendant via his Staxoweb Ltd company, was heard in March at the High Court in London. Her honour Judge Melissa Clarke delivered her judgement today in a 58-page document.

In the very first paragraph Judge Clarke states: “This is judgment in a copyright infringement claim. What is sought, amongst other things, is an injunction which would require the removal of the logo of the First Defendant, Rich Energy Limited, from the Formula 1 race car and website of the Rich Energy Haas Formula 1 motor racing team.”

She concludes that the defendants did indeed infringe Whyte’s copyright, and that “the Claimant is entitled to injunctive relief and for damages or an account of profits at its election.”

Whyte noted that it had used its stag logo since 2008. In their evidence, the defendants said the Rich logo was designed in 2015, after extensive internet searches for stag logos, but they insisted that it was not inspired by Whyte’s version.

In her judgement Judge Clarke made it clear that she did not agree with Storey and Kelly’s explanation of how its logo was originated, noting “the Defendants’ evidence on independent design is at best, in my judgment, confused and contradictory and purports to be supported by documents which are not what they seem.”

In a statement reacting to the outcome of the legal case, Rich Energy CEO Storey was quoted as saying: "I am disappointed in the ruling and felt the material facts
speak for themselves.

"However this is a blip and won’t distract us from the tremendous progress
being made. We are considering our legal options, including appeal, we will not allow it to become a distraction."

A Haas F1 spokesman said the team was unable to comment on any possible changes to its livery at this stage.

 

Next article
Mercedes has "good ideas" to improve record-breaking W10

Previous article

Mercedes has "good ideas" to improve record-breaking W10

Next article

Bottas quickest by 1.4s on first day of Barcelona F1 test

Bottas quickest by 1.4s on first day of Barcelona F1 test
Load comments

About this article

Series Formula 1
Teams Haas F1 Team
Author Adam Cooper