Giorgio Piola's F1 technical analysis
Topic

Giorgio Piola's F1 technical analysis

How Mercedes has taken F1 brake design to the next level

Mercedes has made no secret of the fact that every element of its 2020 Formula 1 car has been improved for this year.

How Mercedes has taken F1 brake design to the next level
Listen to this article

And while most of the attention has been dominated by its DAS system and a bold revamp of its sidepod concept, a deep dig into less obvious areas – like its brakes – highlights the attention to detail the team has put in.

The front brake disc bell is a component that usually divides teams into two camps: those looking for maximum stiffness (such as Ferrari) and those that focus their attention on maximum lightness, (such as Red Bull).

However, in the case of Mercedes, it has looked to F1's past for inspiration as its bell has a truncated cone shape that's full of holes. This not only offers the required stiffness with a reduction in weight, but also brings aero benefit too.

Since 2012, when Adrian Newey introduced a contentious solution on the RB8, teams have skewed their designs to take into account a secondary function: aerodynamics.

The blown axle devised by Red Bull, which took air from the brake inlet and ejected it through holes in the side of the stub axle, was discovered by Giorgio Piola at the second grand prix of the season.

Red Bull RB8 blown axle wheel detail

Red Bull RB8 blown axle wheel detail

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

But, it wasn't until the Monaco GP, which Mark Webber went on to win, that the FIA decided to act.

Charlie Whiting considered the combination of the holes in the wheel and axle, allied to the rotation of the cone-shaped stub axle, to constitute a 'moveable aerodynamic device' and declared this and another borderline solution on the RB8 illegal, requiring the team to be compliant for the Canadian GP.

Williams FW35 front brake duct, captioned

Williams FW35 front brake duct, captioned

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

Teams were not content with filing this idea away in a drawer though, with Williams the first to find a legal way of emulating the concept the following season.

The FW35 featured a hollow and open ended stub axle with a fixed nozzle housed within. Fed airflow in a similar way to the banned Red Bull solution, but no longer rotating around the axle's axis, this version may not have had the same potency but still helped to clean up some of the turbulence created by the wheel and tyre.

Over the course of the next few seasons, many of the teams developed this solution to the point that when the FIA was devising the new regulations for 2019 it decided to outlaw them.

Interestingly, Mercedes never pursued the blown axle concept, instead using the tools available to it on the front wing to help manage this turbulence.

However, the regulation changes for 2019 also took away the majority of these tools, stripping away the aerodynamic furniture from the front wings and with it, Mercedes' reliance on them.

Mercedes, like its counterparts, has in the last few years found subtle ways of funnelling airflow through the brake duct in ways that are still considered a form of brake cooling, although they clearly err on the side of being aerodynamic devices.

Mercedes AMG F1 W11 brake flow

Mercedes AMG F1 W11 brake flow

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

The inner crossover pipe, seen here on the W11 (left) but also present on the W10, certainly constitutes as one of these devices, as its sole purpose is to spill airflow out of the wheel face. The pipework is also contorted in such a way that the nozzle falls close to the border created in the regulations to outlaw the blown axle.

The Technical Regulations state: (11.4.3) No air flow may pass through a circular section 105mm in diameter with its centre lying along the axis and its plane coinciding with the inboard face of the wheel fastener described in Article 12.8.2.

Of course this isn't the only duct that serves an aerodynamic purpose, with two others fashioned into the drum itself (right), one of which sits at the base of the drum, whilst the other is interwoven with the trench formed in the drum's surface.

Mercedes AMG F1 W11 brake disc comparsion

Mercedes AMG F1 W11 brake disc comparsion

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

Blown away

Having had great success with this solution in 2019 and having looked at ways it can enhance this further, we must also pay attention to the W11's brake bell, which has been modified extensively by the team for 2020.

The RB8's design could be considered a forefather here, with numerous holes cut very precisely into the bell's surface to create a robust aerodynamic effect that intensifies the flow of air through the assembly and out of the wheel face to influence the wake turbulence created by the wheel and tyre.

It's not yet clear whether the FIA has scrutinised this, considering the precedent set by the Red Bull solution but, suffice to say that Mercedes will justify the inclusion of these holes for weight saving purposes and that any aerodynamic function is simply a by-product of that.

Once again, this is an example of how consumed F1 teams become in the search of performance, as a component that might seem benign to most, is transformed into a clever aerodynamic solution. It also speaks volumes about Mercedes design methodologies too, as just with many other facets of the car it has left no stone unturned in its pursuit of perfection.

Photo gallery

Ferrari F2007 (658) 2007 wheel cover airflow
Ferrari F2007 (658) 2007 wheel cover airflow
1/17
In 2007, Ferrari introduced a wheel cover design that it convinced the FIA was being used to improve brake cooling. Now, whilst this was the case, it could be argued this was a secondary function, as the design actually had a wider reaching aerodynamic appeal - tidying up the turbulence created by the wheel and tyre. Ferrari's latest solution fashioned a nozzle for that airstream to escape out of, not only creating a more defined pathway but also improving the extraction rate. Other teams swiftly jumped on this bandwagon, realizing the benefits that the simple solution offered.

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

McLaren MP4-23 front wheel spinner
McLaren MP4-23 front wheel spinner
2/17
The allowance of these wheel covers resulted in an explosion of fresh designs arriving for 2008. McLaren introduced its duckbill-style extension which not only transmitted airflow through the brake assembly but also physically altered the flow around the outer face of the tyre.

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

Honda RA108 2008 front wheel cover
Honda RA108 2008 front wheel cover
3/17
Other teams, such as Honda, seen here, had similar solutions, that extended the surface of the wheel cover beyond the wheel rim to better influence the oncoming flow structures.

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

McLaren MP4-23 2008 wheel cover variants
McLaren MP4-23 2008 wheel cover variants
4/17
The various wheel cover solutions used by McLaren during 2008.

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

Brawn BGP 001 2009 front wheel rim cover
Brawn BGP 001 2009 front wheel rim cover
5/17
New regulations arrived in 2009 but wheel covers were still allowed, so teams altered their designs to suit how the airflow they emitted interacted with the new front wings. The wheel cover deployed on the BrawnGP BGP001 saw the nozzle moved to the front quarter of the lower half of the cover, rather than the rear, altering the airflow's interaction with the flow coming off the wider front wing.

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

Force India VJM02 front rim cover
Force India VJM02 front rim cover
6/17
Force India adopted a similar style to McLaren when it came to its wheel covers, as the VJM02 latterly featured a wedge-shaped profile to better guide the airflow

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

Ferrari F10 wheel changes
Ferrari F10 wheel changes
7/17
The wheel covers were banned from 2010 onwards as they flew in the face of the recent regulations that were supposed to improve overtaking. The covers helped to create outwash and in doing so expanded the overall wake profile of the car, creating more turbulence for a trailing car to overcome. Ferrari looked to make up some of their losses with a new wheel fairing design that better controlled some of the aerodynamic instabilities created by the wheel itself.

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

McLaren MP4-27 wheel
McLaren MP4-27 wheel
8/17
It's something that all of the teams looked at and they all came up with their own solutions, such as this design from McLaren in 2012, which featured large holes on the outer edge of the wheel rim.

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

Red Bull RB8 blown axle, red shows airflow ejected as axle rotates (blue arrow)
Red Bull RB8 blown axle, red shows airflow ejected as axle rotates (blue arrow)
9/17
The solution introduced by Red Bull, in 2012, was the game changer though and whilst deemed illegal it became the forefather in the designs that came thereafter.

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

Williams FW35 front brake duct, captioned
Williams FW35 front brake duct, captioned
10/17
Williams was the first to create a legal version of the Red Bull design in 2013, utilising a hollow axle that allowed airflow captured by the brake duct inlet to be funnelled out of the axle's open end. The team even supplemented this with a shaped nozzle within the axle that would better direct the airflow as it mixed with the turbulence created by the front wheel and tyre.

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

Red Bull RB9 front brake and brake duct, captioned
Red Bull RB9 front brake and brake duct, captioned
11/17
Other similar designs swiftly followed, with Red Bull equipping the RB9 with a similar solution to the one seen at Williams.

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

Ferrari F14 T front brake duct and blown axle
Ferrari F14 T front brake duct and blown axle
12/17
Ferrari joined the camp in 2014, when it ran a blown axle solution on the F14-T.

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

Ferrari SF15-T front caliper
Ferrari SF15-T front caliper
13/17
This was followed up in 2015 with a revised design for their SF15-T.

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

Haas VF-16 blown axle which was closed for Baku
Haas VF-16 blown axle which was closed for Baku
14/17
Haas, using the same components as Ferrari, also utilised a blown axle on their 2016 challenger but from time-to-time opted to close the outlet, as seen here in Baku.

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

Renault R.S.18 front brake duct
Renault R.S.18 front brake duct
15/17
The Renault RS18 utilised a blown axle, taking advantage of the aerodynamic influence it could have on the turbulence created by the front tyre and wheel.

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

Red Bull Racing RB13 blown front axle detail
Red Bull Racing RB13 blown front axle detail
16/17
This image captured of the Red Bull RB13, as one of the mechanics uses a blower to cool the brakes, shows how the airflow is ejected from the axle.

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

2021 F1 rules model
2021 F1 rules model
17/17
Wheel covers will return in 2022, as part of the sports push to help improve the aerodynamic envelope of the car in order that cars can race in much closer proximity.

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

shares
comments
Ferrari backed 2021 rules delay to send "responsible signal"
Previous article

Ferrari backed 2021 rules delay to send "responsible signal"

Next article

Gallery: F1’s youngest-ever pole winners

Gallery: F1’s youngest-ever pole winners
Why Mercedes believes it can make the step F1 needs to fight Red Bull Prime

Why Mercedes believes it can make the step F1 needs to fight Red Bull

The 2022 Formula 1 season was Mercedes' leanest for a decade, achieving just a solitary pole and grand prix win. Yet the team is confident it has got the tools it needs to cast that disappointment aside and return to the front of the field again next year.

How BRM's one-off F1 double defied its rollercoaster history Prime

How BRM's one-off F1 double defied its rollercoaster history

It’s 60 years since BRM achieved its goal and Graham Hill led the team to a world title double. But that was just part of the remarkable story of a unique team that at times overstretched its resources and had its fair share of disappointments.

Formula 1
Dec 8, 2022
The bold F1 DRS experiment that could end the debate forever Prime

The bold F1 DRS experiment that could end the debate forever

OPINION: The effectiveness of DRS in Formula 1 remains a topic of debate as the winter break gives a chance for reflection on the racing we saw in 2022. For all of its detractors, perhaps an experiment where DRS is cast aside and the impact this has on racing is in order to truly understand its merits in modern F1.

Formula 1
Dec 8, 2022
The sliding doors moment that saved Red Bull and Porsche Prime

The sliding doors moment that saved Red Bull and Porsche

OPINION: Everything looked set for Red Bull and Porsche to join forces for the 2026 season, before the marriage between both parties was called off. While at the time it looked like a major coup for Formula 1 in gaining both VW Group powerhouses Audi and Porsche for 2026, Red Bull and Porsche have really been spared a potentially fractious relationship.

Formula 1
Dec 7, 2022
How Tyrrell’s post-Stewart era descended into a fight to survive Prime

How Tyrrell’s post-Stewart era descended into a fight to survive

Glory days for Tyrrell became increasingly infrequent
 after Jackie Stewart’s retirement. But in the latest instalment of his history of the team for Autosport's sister title GP Racing, 
MAURICE HAMILTON recalls how Ken Tyrrell’s plucky and defiantly small team stayed bold enough to innovate – springing a surprise with F1’s first six-wheeled car

Formula 1
Dec 6, 2022
How departing F1 boss Brawn views F1’s new rules - and the future Prime

How departing F1 boss Brawn views F1’s new rules - and the future

Multiple-title-winning designer and team boss Ross Brawn is finally leaving Formula 1 after nearly 50 years in motorsport. But he still has plenty of insights on what’s working and what comes next, as he revealed to Motorsport.com in a far-reaching exclusive interview in Abu Dhabi.

Formula 1
Dec 2, 2022
The key F1 management call Ferrari must make to avoid more defeat Prime

The key F1 management call Ferrari must make to avoid more defeat

OPINION: Mattia Binotto’s departure from Ferrari will naturally bring a range of changes across the Formula 1 team. But how the changes shape up and the impact they could have is set to be dictated by a key direction Ferrari’s top dogs will need to pick

Formula 1
Nov 30, 2022
The difference between Mercedes’ stumble and the fall of F1 giants Prime

The difference between Mercedes’ stumble and the fall of F1 giants

OPINION: Mercedes endured its worst season of the hybrid Formula 1 era, but was mercifully spared its first winless campaign in over a decade late on. It has owned up to the mistakes it made which led to its troubled W13. And while its task to return to title-challenging contention is not small, its 2022 season seems more like a blip than the beginning of a downward spiral.

Formula 1
Nov 29, 2022