Subscribe

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Motorsport prime

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Edition

USA

McLaren and Red Bull refused to accept elimination qualifying compromise

Formula 1’s failure to change its under-fire elimination qualifying format was sealed when McLaren and Red Bull refused to accept anything other than ditching the shoot-out idea completely, Motorsport.com has learned.

Jenson Button, McLaren MP4-31

Photo by: XPB Images

Press Conference (From back row (L to R)): Cyril Abiteboul, Renault Sport F1 Managing Director, Eric Boullier, McLaren Racing Director; Gene Haas, Haas Automotion President, Christian Horner, Red Bull Racing Team Principal, Toto Wolff, Mercedes AMG F1 Shareholder and Executive Director, Maurizio Arrivabene, Ferrari Team Principal.
Pascal Wehrlein, Manor Racing MRT05
Polesitter Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes AMG F1 Team, second place Nico Rosberg, Mercedes AMG F1 Team, third place Sebastian Vettel, Ferrari during the press conference
Jenson Button, McLaren MP4-31
Daniel Ricciardo, Red Bull Racing RB12
Nico Hulkenberg, Sahara Force India F1 and Sebastian Vettel, Ferrari SF16-H
Kevin Magnussen, Renault Sport F1 Team RS16
Fernando Alonso, McLaren MP4-31 spins
Marcus Ericsson, Sauber C35
Christian Horner, Red Bull Racing Team Principal during the press conference

In another dramatic twist to the saga surrounding F1’s qualifying system, sources have confirmed that the two outfits were unwilling to play ball with an alternative solution that had been put on the table by the FIA this week.

And without their support - and the need for unanimous backing for any change to go through - the idea to tweak elimination qualifying was left dead in the water, with no time left to do anything other than keep the system that proved so unpopular in Australia.

FIA plan

After the shambolic end to Q3 in Australia, teams had unanimously agreed in Melbourne to ditch elimination qualifying and go back to last year’s system for the next race in Bahrain.

However, a decision was made by the FIA to not go that far and abandon the positive aspects of the change. Instead it wanted to give the shoot-out system another try, albeit in an improved format.

This week therefore, teams on the Strategy Group and F1 Commission found themselves only able to vote on a revised format to elimination qualifying proposed by the FIA, where the new-style Q1 and Q2 would be extended, and Q3 would revert to how it was last year.

One theory as to why teams were only given this option to vote on was that it would effectively force their hands to accept it, as they would be highly unlikely to reject it and keep the Australian system that was so universally criticised.

However, if that was a motivation for not giving teams the option of going back to last year’s system, then it failed entirely because McLaren and Red Bull refused to support it and did not vote in favour.

Without their support, the vote did not go through, meaning that F1 is heading to Bahrain with the same under-fire elimination qualifying format that was run in Australia – and little prospect of it delivering a better show in Q3 this time.

F1 criticism

In a week when the GPDA spoke out about F1’s ‘obsolete’ rules structure, and the sport making a bold move away from free-to-air TV in Britain, the inability of F1 to get rid of a hated qualifying format has left it facing further criticism.

F1 chiefs will almost certainly get together after the Bahrain Grand Prix to decide what to do for the remainder of the season - and it appears likely that teams will only accept going back to last year’s format in its entirety.

Red Bull boss Christian Horner said in Australia that the month-long saga surrounding elimination qualifying has not been good for F1.

“I don’t think we probably handled the whole qualifying thing that well,” he said. “I don’t think we covered ourselves in glory with it.

“But the important thing is to learn from it. Any change has to be fully considered about what the consequences are, and I don’t think we did that.

“The intentions were there, for all the right reasons, it just didn’t achieve what was intended. The teams shouldn’t run the sport. That’s the fundamental thing.”

Be part of Motorsport community

Join the conversation
Previous article Rosberg: F1 radio clampdown the right decision for fans
Next article Red Bull: Good expectations for a night race in Bahrain

Top Comments

There are no comments at the moment. Would you like to write one?

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Motorsport prime

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Edition

USA