Coy Vettel doubles down on Canadian GP incident
Sebastian Vettel coyly avoided questions about his Canadian Grand Prix penalty and his Ferrari Formula 1 team's Friday hearing in France, as he reiterated his belief he did nothing wrong.

Ferrari has been summoned to the stewards tomorrow at Paul Ricard to discuss its request for a review of the incident where Vettel ran across the grass in Montreal and rejoined just as Lewis Hamilton tried to pass him for the lead.
Read Also:
The team wants the stewards to revisit the incident, which led to a five-second penalty that cost Vettel the win, and ahead of the French Grand Prix Vettel faced multiple direct questions about what happened in Canada and the stewards' hearing.
"First of all it [the review] is to open the case again and have another look," said Vettel. "I think we bring some information that maybe the stewards didn't have at the time, and we'll see what happens."
Asked if he was confident about getting the win back, Vettel replied: "I don't know, but I still have the same view as I had two weeks ago. So we will see what happens."
Vettel did not offer substantial responses when asked about the support he had received from several world champions and current F1 drivers in the wake of the penalty, or about Nico Rosberg's criticism of his mistakes.
When asked what happened to the promise drivers received from the FIA about being allowed to race more freely, Vettel said: "I don't know. Honest answer."
Ferrari is expected to present GPS data and Vettel's own testimony among the new evidence it needs to convince the stewards to look at the incident again, and potentially overturn the decision.
But asked if Ferrari had a key piece of evidence to do that, Vettel simply said: "Ask the team."
While Vettel was unwilling to discuss the topic of the review, he did revisit elements of the incident itself.
Read Also:
He explained that he partially applied the throttle while off-track to stabilise the rear of the car over the grass, and dismissed the difference in his braking point from the lap before because of the impact fuel-saving and lift-and-coast has on such metrics.
Pushed on the significance of another error, albeit one that did not occur in wheel-to-wheel combat with Hamilton, Vettel argued that Hamilton made his own mistakes during their battle.
"So, you can argue I did the mistake at the wrong place in the track," said Vettel. "If I had done it at the hairpin for example, [I would have] just lost a bit of time."
A review will be the first time Vettel has been able to state his case to the stewards because the decision was made in-race and without individual testimony.
Asked by Motorsport.com if he felt that was valid, Vettel said: "I don't think you can answer that question. Yes and no, it depends.
"If you speed in the pitlane, then do you really need to go to the stewards and have a look again? I don't think so. You know what I mean. It depends on the case."

Previous article
Ricciardo says Renault's recent form has "ignited a fire"
Next article
French GP: Latest F1 tech updates, straight from pitlane

About this article
Series | Formula 1 |
Drivers | Sebastian Vettel |
Teams | Ferrari |
Author | Scott Mitchell |
Coy Vettel doubles down on Canadian GP incident
Trending
Scuderia Ferrari Filming Day Backstage Footage
Back to Work | Valtteri Bottas' 2021 Seat Fit
F1 Explained | Mercedes Power Unit
How McLaren F1’s new investors have already made an impact
The deal McLaren concluded with MSP Sports Capital last year which will help the cash-strapped Formula 1 team pay for much-needed infrastructure upgrades, also points toward the future for F1 itself, says GP Racing's Stuart Codling.
Why Verstappen isn't interested in the hype game
In a pre-season where Red Bull has been unusually quiet, Max Verstappen has also been guarded about the team's fortunes in 2021. Even after trying the RB16B for the first time at Silverstone, the Dutchman was careful to manage expectations
The pros and cons of F1's 2021 rule changes
In the strategy for grand prix racing's future, 2021 represents a significant step towards the goal of closer racing and a more level playing field. That's the theory behind the latest raft of changes, but will they have the desired effect?
What Red Bull is trying to hide with its RB16B launch
Red Bull made no secret of the fact its 2021 F1 car is an evolution of its predecessor, but in keeping the same foundations while hiding some tightly-guarded updates with its RB16B, the team aims to avoid suffering the same pitfalls of previous years
How Albon plans to fight his way out of Red Bull limbo
Alex Albon has faced the media for the first time since he lost his Red Bull drive at the end of 2020 and dropped out of a Formula 1 race seat altogether. He has a history of bouncing back from setbacks, so here's what he must do to rise again
Ranked! Carlin's greatest F1 graduates
Carlin has helped guide enough drivers to Formula 1 to fill out an entire grid, plus a handful of reserves, to create a remarkable alumni list. With Yuki Tsunoda set to join that group, Motorsport.com has ranked its graduates to grace the grand prix scene...
Why Alfa's 2021 launch says more about its 2022 plans
Alfa Romeo launched its C41 with a revised front nose, but there's little to suggest it will surge up the leaderboard in 2021. As the team frankly admits, it's putting its eggs in the basket labelled 2022 and hoping to hold the eighth place it earned last year
Why Gasly’s AlphaTauri haven is a blessing and a curse
Red Bull opted not to re-sign Pierre Gasly even before it decided to drop Alex Albon and so the Frenchman's Formula 1 journey will continue at AlphaTauri. This has positive and negative connotations for one of last season's star performers.