Mostert technical breach explained

Supercars stewards weren't satisfied that evidence of kerb contact was a sufficient argument against penalising Chaz Mostert for a bodywork breach in Sydney.

Mostert technical breach explained

Mostert qualified on the front row for the third and final race at Sydney Motorsport Park on Sunday, only to be punted to the back of the grid for a technical breach.

Officials found that the front guard width exceeded the allowance in the Vehicle Specification Document for the ZB Holden Commodore.

While not arguing the breach itself, Walkinshaw Andretti United did attempt to explain that contact with a kerb left the car with broken mounts that pushed the guards out.

That there was contact with a kerb was proven by on-board vision, however the argument itself didn't satisfy stewards who proceeded with the disqualification following the hearing.

Penalties for non-confirming bodywork are rare in cases where panels have been dislodged by contact during sessions.

However Motorsport.com understands a lack of visible signs of contact was the key factor in this particular case.

Had there been physical damage to the panels more leniency may have been applied.

"Following a post-session hearing into a charge against WAU Racing Pty Ltd that car #25, Chaz Mostert, was in breach of Rule C2.1.1 (a car must comply with the design, relevant VSD, ESD, and the rules) because the width of the front guards was found by Supercars Technical at post-session scrutineering not to comply with the VSD for a Holden Commodore VB," read the stewards report.

"The stewards summonsed the competitor to a hearing and heard from the competitor, its driver and the [Head of Motorsport].

"The competitor gave evidence (confirmed by the driver and on-board vision) that the car hit the kerb at Turn 10 and this caused the damage to the car and resulted in the non-compliance.

"The HOM replied that if the damage was caused by hitting the kerb, then the setup for the car was a contributing factor.

"The stewards decided that they were not satisfied that the striking of the kerb (if it did create the damage) amounts to exceptional circumstances that would exculpate the breach nor amount to a mitigating factor justifying some other penalty other than the imposition of the usual penalty, namely disqualification for a technical breach (which is also the recommended minimum penalty)."

Mostert recovered to a fine third place in the wet and wild night race.

shares
comments
'Rivers' worried Supercars front-runners in Sydney
Previous article

'Rivers' worried Supercars front-runners in Sydney

Next article

Why van Gisbergen and De Pasquale escaped penalty in Sydney

Why van Gisbergen and De Pasquale escaped penalty in Sydney
Load comments
Why Courtney and Tickford are a dream match Prime

Why Courtney and Tickford are a dream match

James Courtney has been around the block in his motorsport career it's fair to say. After a single-seater career cut short, he's won everything there is to win in Supercars. Following a rocky ride recently in the Australian category, he's found a happy hunting ground with Tickford Racing.

Supercars
Oct 21, 2021
How taming his temper shaped Supercars' slow-burn star Prime

How taming his temper shaped Supercars' slow-burn star

His decision to leave Brad Jones Racing was the biggest shock of the Australian Supercars silly season so far. But for Nick Percat, it comes as the culmination of a personal journey that has made him into one of the most rounded drivers in the series, now in search of a seat that can make him a champion

Supercars
Sep 17, 2021
Why replacing Supercars' GOAT with a teenager is worth the risk for T8 Prime

Why replacing Supercars' GOAT with a teenager is worth the risk for T8

On the face of it, picking an 18-year-old rookie to replace arguably the greatest Supercars driver of all time is a risky move. But as Jamie Whincup takes up a team principal role and hands his car to Broc Feeney, it's one that he is confident will be rewarded in the fullness of time - time which wasn't afforded to Whincup in his early days

Supercars
Sep 1, 2021
How Randle went from fighting cancer to battling for Supercars contention Prime

How Randle went from fighting cancer to battling for Supercars contention

After his fledgling career was paused by a battle with testicular cancer, Thomas Randle then had to wrestle with finding a drive in Supercars after he got the all-clear. It's been a long road for the Melbourne native but, after two lengthy battles, he's finally got a full-time drive to look forward to

Supercars
Jun 29, 2021
How crisis talks over Supercars’ Gen3 future could leave it without a paddle Prime

How crisis talks over Supercars’ Gen3 future could leave it without a paddle

With Supercars’ Gen3 era on the horizon, a shift is set to take place – in more ways than one – but, as has become clear in recent weeks, the plan to bin the stick and use paddles with electronic assisted shift has been met with fierce opposition

Supercars
May 24, 2021
Can DJR still be a Supercars powerhouse after Penske? Prime

Can DJR still be a Supercars powerhouse after Penske?

Roger Penske's whirlwind Australian Supercars sojourn is over. After six seasons, three drivers' titles, three teams' championships and a Bathurst 1000 crown, The Captain has sold his controlling stake in Dick Johnson Racing back to the squad and walked away from the category.

Supercars
Feb 26, 2021
Can Whincup be Triple Eight's ruthless leader? Prime

Can Whincup be Triple Eight's ruthless leader?

Supercars' most successful team of the past 15 years is set for a radical shakeup next year when Jamie Whincup retires from driving and takes over the reins at Triple Eight. But does he have what it takes to be the new Roland Dane?

Supercars
Feb 8, 2021
How a lifetime Supercars deal broke down in one year Prime

How a lifetime Supercars deal broke down in one year

David Reynolds inked what was effectively a lifetime deal with Erebus in 2019 – only to walk out a year later. What went wrong?

Supercars
Dec 18, 2020