Subscribe

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Motorsport prime

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Edition

USA

Penske, Triple Eight await protest decision

DJR Team Penske and Triple Eight Race Engineering are waiting for the Supercars stewards to make a final decision on Shane van Gisbergen's controversial Pukekohe race win.

Race winner Shane van Gisbergen, Triple Eight Race Engineering Holden, second place Scott McLaughlin, DJR Team Penske

Photo by: Dirk Klynsmith / Motorsport Images

Van Gisbergen escaped penalty for spinning wheels during his second pitstop in yesterday's opening 200-kilometre race, which meant keeping a hard-fought race win and closing the gap to series leader Scott McLaughlin to just two points.

However the Ford team immediately protested the decision, which led to a hearing at the New Zealand circuit this morning.

The hearing itself has now been concluded, with both sides waiting to see whether van Gisbergen or McLaughlin will ultimately be declared the race winner.

As decision is expected later today.

"We’ve spent some time in there, we’ve put our case forward," said DJRTP team manager Ben Croke.

"The stewards have adjourned the hearing and they’re going to come back to us with a result later on.

“We’ll wait and see. We’ve presented a pretty good case. They’ve heard determinations from Michael Masi, DRD, and they will make their decision in due course.”

Read Also:

Triple Eight team manager Mark Dutton added: "The protest wasn’t technically actually against Triple Eight, it was against Michael Masi, the Deputy Race Director and his decision yesterday.

"I was there clearly because it effects our car, to have a say. Everyone had their say and now it’s up to the stewards.

“We think there’s been consistency with how the Deputy Race Director has made his decisions. There’s clear precedence set at Bathurst this year, unfortunately for the car, both precedents happened on car #9 – an early one which was a breach but no penalty required, the same as Shane’s, and then they also had one that did require a penalty.

"All we ask for, everyone up and down pit lane is consistency; I believe there has been consistency in these decisions.”

Be part of Motorsport community

Join the conversation
Previous article Stanaway ready to fight for Supercars future
Next article Pukekohe Supercars: Reynolds takes provisional Sunday pole

Top Comments

There are no comments at the moment. Would you like to write one?

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Motorsport prime

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Edition

USA