Formula 1
Formula 1
28 Mar
FP1 in
28 days
R
Emilia Romagna GP
18 Apr
Race in
51 days
09 May
Next event in
69 days
23 May
Race in
86 days
R
Azerbaijan GP
06 Jun
Race in
100 days
13 Jun
Race in
107 days
27 Jun
Race in
121 days
04 Jul
Next event in
125 days
18 Jul
Race in
142 days
R
Hungarian GP
01 Aug
Race in
156 days
29 Aug
Race in
184 days
05 Sep
Race in
191 days
12 Sep
Race in
198 days
26 Sep
Race in
212 days
R
Singapore GP
03 Oct
Next event in
216 days
10 Oct
Race in
226 days
R
United States GP
24 Oct
Race in
240 days
31 Oct
Race in
247 days
R
Australian GP
21 Nov
Race in
268 days
R
Saudi Arabia GP
05 Dec
Race in
282 days
R
Abu Dhabi GP
12 Dec
Race in
289 days

Opinion: How senior citizens owned F1 over Miami track plan

It’s hard to believe it, but yesterday a well-organized group of elderly ladies gave a global sport and a multiple Superbowl-winning NFL franchise a lesson in how to make your point. They influenced a county commission meeting that made the Miami Grand Prix far less likely to happen than planned in 2021.

shares
comments
Opinion: How senior citizens owned F1 over Miami track plan

Miami’s already had one failed F1 bid, as a street circuit race in downtown that failed to come to fruition for a multitude of logistical reasons and local resident opposition. But shifting it to a new track built in the car parks around Hard Rock Stadium should be simple, right?

Wrong. Betty T Ferguson, a former county commissioner for Miami Gardens – the city in which the Miami Dolphins’ stadium is situated – has rallied a vociferous opposition group, mainly consisting of female senior citizens from the nearby community. It had already persuaded the city council to vote against the plan with its claims of ‘deep pockets overriding quality of life’; now it has managed to get two motions approved by the county that means far more bureaucratic red tape to be cleared before it can happen.

Read Also:

Miami track rendering

Miami track rendering

Photo by: Hard Rock Stadium

Perhaps the most shocking thing about this meeting was how badly prepared F1 and the Dolphins were. While the opposition easily filled its half hour of initial lobbying, the ‘F1 group’ came up 10 minutes short. The opposition managed to get its attorney to speak twice, the second time to counter F1’s presentation, but the other group got no such right to reply. In fact, it took the F1-supporting county Mayor to interject and ask some questions to help its cause, including its outline of benefits to the community it would hand out – such as playground rebuilds, $25 raceday tickets, etc.

Sure, F1 had its commercial chief Sean Bratches there, and the first of the Dade county residents to speak was two-time F1 world champion Emerson Fittipaldi, and both spoke eloquently about the undoubted benefits that the sport would bring to Miami. But nobody was arguing about that.

What transpired was that the F1 group found nothing like the support it required in the face of the impassioned local opposition, which included a 90-year-old lady who’d lived in the adjacent area for decades. Apparently, they had all been instructed to wear orange and the impact of that was striking – no wonder Max Verstappen gets such a boost from his army of supporters! One of the few non-orange-clad supporters was a gentleman wearing a homemade ‘TRUMP SUCKS’ shirt, who bizarrely claimed F1 had “killed many with its clouds of smoke” and that “kids are gonna breathe in that stuff thinking it’s good”.

This served to echo community activist Ferguson’s opening statements about the “deadly effects” of hosting an F1 race in a city environment. What the F1 group really needed to hand was an environmental assessment report from city-based events such as Melbourne, Montreal, Monaco or Singapore. But not one shred of evidence was put forward along those lines; only economic benefits were put forward by the F1 group – which, if anything, played into the hands of Ferguson’s “deep pockets overriding quality of life” allegations. As you can see in the render below, the track would back on to residential areas...

Miami track rendering

Miami track rendering

Photo by: Hard Rock Stadium

In fact, the only scientific evidence on show was a Miami-Dade County sound study report. It stated that hearing damage was possible after eight seconds of being exposed to 132dB. Nobody stepped forward to mention the distance away the crowd would be from the cars, and it took an F1 fan to raise the point of how sound actually travels, so fans wouldn’t be exposed to constant peaks of noise.

The majority of the opposition’s scaremongering, far-fetched and borderline preposterous claims of the “deadly effects” of F1 thus went unchallenged. And the message was compounded by the current county commissioner for Miami Gardens, Barbara Jordan, who is vehemently opposed to the plan. She actually used a crash-filled showreel of F1 racing to prove her point about how impactful it would be to the community.

“Look at the racing!” said Jordan shortly before the voting took place. “There are six schools located within a mile of the stadium. One of them is across the street! Friday is a school day. How can our kids learn when you have noise levels. The lobbyists told me the cars are quieter now, 134db. Well, I dare you to stand under the decibel noise for five minutes because you’ll walk away deaf.

“Formula 1 tires: In that video you saw the smoke coming of the tires? It’s toxic. Listen, I haven’t been able to sleep over this, just thinking about those tires going around and spinning. When I was researching all of this I came across a YouTube show by a driver called Scott Mansell, it’s called Driver61, and he took a Pirelli tire off one of the F1 cars and cut it in two. And when he did it, the smoke got to him, and he had to go and put on a mask. The shavings from the tire filled his shirt – poisonous shavings! The tire particles covered his shirt as he cut it open and the mask was needed to protect his eyes from the smoke.

“These tires are soft and degradable, it disintegrates while it is racing, and those things go out into the community. That’s what we’re talking about here, putting on this event in a bedroom community within a mile of six schools. The race cannot be run on existing roads, and the work that would be required has to have racing surfaces. If they use 199th [Street] they’d have to put up guardrails and fences, and a surface so you wouldn’t be able to skid off the road.

“I just want you to get a picture of what we’re talking about here: we’re not talking about the races that go on in Homestead Speedway, they have never had a race like this in the United States, apart from Austin, Texas.”

So apart from the fact a far-louder iteration of F1 has raced on the streets of Long Beach, Las Vegas and Detroit; apart from the fact a new road surface you can’t skid off might be a good thing; I’ve never seen any scientific evidence about an adverse medical impact of Pirelli’s high-degradation tires; and why on earth would anyone think a former BOSS Formula racer’s YouTube clip of him chopping up a tire is relevant?

But the simple fact was that it worked. The commissioners voted 7-6 and then 8-5 to pass both motions, which now means a full public hearing must happen in December, and any county road closures for motor racing must be approved by the commission – adding another layer of bureaucracy.

And it was those health and quality of living fears that clearly swung it, and that was the battleground that F1 and the Dolphins group must now focus their attentions upon if this event is going to happen. Going forwards, put bluntly, it needs to shut down the bullshit claims with science.

One thing on its side is the fact that the county Mayor has a right of veto over the motions, but if he does so it will look like some blatant railroading against a community’s wishes.

The moral of the story? Never underestimate some angry old ladies, whoever you think you are.

Proposed track layout for Miami Grand Prix track at Hard Rock Stadium

Proposed track layout for Miami Grand Prix track at Hard Rock Stadium

Photo by: Motorsport.com

Marko: Mexico deadline for 2020 F1 line-up "a mistake"

Previous article

Marko: Mexico deadline for 2020 F1 line-up "a mistake"

Next article

Ferrari, Williams against delaying 2021 F1 rules

Ferrari, Williams against delaying 2021 F1 rules
Load comments

About this article

Series Formula 1
Author Charles Bradley
The pros and cons of F1's 2021 rule changes Prime

The pros and cons of F1's 2021 rule changes

In the strategy for grand prix racing's future, 2021 represents a significant step towards the goal of closer racing and a more level playing field. That's the theory behind the latest raft of changes, but will they have the desired effect?

Formula 1
Feb 24, 2021
What Red Bull is trying to hide with its RB16B launch Prime

What Red Bull is trying to hide with its RB16B launch

Red Bull made no secret of the fact its 2021 F1 car is an evolution of its predecessor, but in keeping the same foundations while hiding some tightly-guarded updates with its RB16B, the team aims to avoid suffering the same pitfalls of previous years

Formula 1
Feb 23, 2021
How Albon plans to fight his way out of Red Bull limbo Prime

How Albon plans to fight his way out of Red Bull limbo

Alex Albon has faced the media for the first time since he lost his Red Bull drive at the end of 2020 and dropped out of a Formula 1 race seat altogether. He has a history of bouncing back from setbacks, so here's what he must do to rise again

Formula 1
Feb 23, 2021
Ranked! Carlin's greatest F1 graduates Prime

Ranked! Carlin's greatest F1 graduates

Carlin has helped guide enough drivers to Formula 1 to fill out an entire grid, plus a handful of reserves, to create a remarkable alumni list. With Yuki Tsunoda set to join that group, Motorsport.com has ranked its graduates to grace the grand prix scene...

Formula 1
Feb 22, 2021
Why Alfa's 2021 launch says more about its 2022 plans Prime

Why Alfa's 2021 launch says more about its 2022 plans

Alfa Romeo launched its C41 with a revised front nose, but there's little to suggest it will surge up the leaderboard in 2021. As the team frankly admits, it's putting its eggs in the basket labelled 2022 and hoping to hold the eighth place it earned last year

Formula 1
Feb 22, 2021
Why Gasly’s AlphaTauri haven is a blessing and a curse Prime

Why Gasly’s AlphaTauri haven is a blessing and a curse

Red Bull opted not to re-sign Pierre Gasly even before it decided to drop Alex Albon and so the Frenchman's Formula 1 journey will continue at AlphaTauri. This has positive and negative connotations for one of last season's star performers.

Formula 1
Feb 20, 2021
Eight things Red Bull must do to beat Mercedes in 2021 Prime

Eight things Red Bull must do to beat Mercedes in 2021

After seven years of defeat at the hands of Mercedes, Red Bull is as hungry as ever to secure a fifth world championship. But there are key challenges it must overcome in 2021 to switch from challenger to conqueror

Formula 1
Feb 19, 2021
How AlphaTauri has adapted to F1's new rules Prime

How AlphaTauri has adapted to F1's new rules

AlphaTauri launched its AT02, complete with a new livery, as it bids to home in on an already-tight midfield battle. Although there were few outright new parts displayed on the launch render, there might be a few clues into further changes down the line…

Formula 1
Feb 19, 2021